Late reply, but I'd reiterate many of these points by saying that traditional film technology provides a set of tools that remains more or less constant over the years of use (at least far more constant than digital photography and computer tools). Master the tools once and just forget about it. Think about the pictures. Ok, maybe an odd point on a digital printing forum where the tech is also moving pretty quickly, and yes I do have a DSLR in addition to some film gear. But you know, among my gear, I have stuff like an M6, an FM3a, a Nikkor 105/2.5 or Leica 28/2 and 90/2.8 - and I just have absolutely zero desire to ever "upgrade" these tools. I could/can/very well might use these tools until they fall apart in my hands. Film camera technology does progress (say AF accuracy and speed or fancy automagical metering schemes or USM lenses), but I personally don't give a hoot about those technologies. With digital, I've been forced to compromise because of the cost of the gear and the rate of progress. In other words, I snagged a D70 with it's totally abysmal VF (1) because the cost of a great DSLR VF in the Nikon system was too rich for my blood, and (2) I feel the need to anticipate the cost of relatively speedy body replacement when I think of the cost of body. Some will say that I can use the D70 forever, but the point is that it's a camera I own, use but don't really like. Like I said, it was a compromise (and a steep one). At least on the specs, with the new D200, Nikon has addressed nearly every criticism I've had (excepting it's lack of support for a standard cable release). Maybe that signals a little maturation of DSLR design in the Nikon system, but only time will really tell. Scott lours51 wrote: >Just my feelings about this very important subject. > >I am still using film and will for a long while I guess. At >present if I had to go digital I would only go for a small pocketable >camera. > >- Film is a very mature technic it had never been as good. >- Film storage is easy and gives no hassle ; it seems that some >museums make negatives out of digital files due to that. >- With a neg or a slide you have a picture in hand that you can see, >no such thing with a digital file. >- Film forces you to think before you release the shutter. >- As someone said earlier in this thread, the pictures grow in you >and the treatment is also part of my pleasure. >- The camera can be all mechanical, mature technic as well, no >battery, it is very reliable and straight forward to use. > >- Digital is just born, the equipment is obsolete within months, >there is no second hand market ; we talk now of curved sensor for >example. >- It is mainly electronics and that's very fragile, it sucks >batteries within a whisper. >- It relies on computer technology forcing you to keep up with both. >- It is very easy to lost your files, they can get easily corrupted >or erased. >- Nonetheless the actual results are promising. > >I consider digital to be the typical consumer product, Snap, Look and >Throw, you consume images. As an "amateur", for the reasons mentioned >above, I will never deep in four figures $$$$ into a piece of >electronic equipment, so I eliminate professionnal machines. >And marketing doesn't help, when will we have just a simple camera, I >don't want it to be a thermometer, clock, phone or coffee machine ! >I may have one of these toys and use it as such until some of the >inconvenients are in control then I will reconsider my opinion. > >One final word, Mister Everybody who bought a digicam, will realise >his mistake the day he will turn back and look for his souvenirs, >there are many chances he won't have any, in return it was so easy to >open a dusty shoebox and find everything in there. > >Michel > > > > > > > > >Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > >If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. > >Please follow these basic guidelines: >- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. >- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. >- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. >- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See \ufffdGroup Topic, Rules and Guidelines\ufffd in the Files section: >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > >BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE \ufffdOWNER\ufffd AND \ufffdMODERATORS\ufffd OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE \ufffdOWNER\ufffd AND \ufffdMODERATORS\ufffd OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digital Vs. Film
2005-12-19 by Scott McLoughlin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.