Hi igor..... one main difference between the two RIPS is the support you get from the community of users. QTR seems to be used by many more people than the Bowhaus RIP is, and so if you have questions you have a better chance of getting them answered. Put another way, if you're think you may need a lot of handholding (which I did when I started) QTR is likely a better choice. Ed --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "isvibilsky" <isvibilsky@y...> wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > I use epson 2200 with the standart set of inks. Until now I printed > all my sepia toned images using epson driver with custom built icc > profiles. Depending on the image I could get a decent result. But some > images with deep shadows were impossible to print. That's why I > started to look for RIPs. > I've been trying the QTR software for some time but still not totally > happy with the printouts. No doubt that QTR solves the issue but the > printouts look for me kinda flat compare to printed through epson driver. > I was hoping to try IJM/OPM and compare the results but there is no > try before buy option available. > Could anybody share his/her experience? > > Regarding flat looking printouts. My assumption is I don't use a > special set of inks so I don't take advantage of the RIP completely. > > Thanks, > Igor. >
Message
Re: QTR vs IJC/OPM
2005-12-26 by edrudolpho
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.