Excellent. And interesting approach to the problem. I stand corrected. -- Bruce Watson Paul Roark wrote: > Bruce, > > > ...Please correct me if I'm wrong here: > > > > The UT7 inkset appears to have two toner sets - three cool (cyan) inks > > and three warm (magenta) inks with a common black. Basically two > > quadtone inksets used together. It gets a neutral tone by mixing the > > cool and warm together. This is true, yes? > > No, to simplify, with respect to making neutral prints the variable tone > inksets have 2 "channels" -- one pure carbon warm and one carbon with > "blue" > pigments mixed in to make the ink cool. (The mix that goes into the > "blue" > toner varies -- basically cyan and magenta or R800 blue.) > > What is important to note is that the warm channel is pure carbon -- no > color pigments at all. It is not a "magenta" channel. Actually MIS > carbon > is essentially a low gamut yellow. > > > > That the cool ink is cool means that it has a higher percentage of cyan > > pigment ink than the more neutral K7 does. > > Yes, but the color is not just cyan. It's blue (a mix of cyan and magenta > or blue). > > > The warm side is similar - it has a higher percentage of magenta pigment > > than the K7 does. It has to to get the warmer tone. > > No, this is where the misunderstanding is. The warm side is pure carbon. > Thus it has less color pigment than a neutral monotone inkset. The mix of > the cool and warm channels simply brings the total carbon-to-color pigment > ratio to essentially the same as it would be if the mix was uniform in > both > channels. > > Having a pure carbon channel has been one of my design criteria, because I > want the ability to print a good pure carbon image. For old photo > reproductions they look great and are the most lightfast. So far, > carbon is > the champ when it comes to longevity. So, a pure carbon channel has been > one of my bottom line requirements. > > > These two inks, warm and cool, are then mixed on the paper to get the > > tone you want. This is how it works, is it not? > > Yes, that is correct. But the warm channel is pure carbon -- no color > pigs. > > I hope this helps clarify the comparison for you. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Piezography K7 vs. the rest
2005-12-27 by hogarth@snappydsl.net
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.