Julian- I wasn't taking a shot at you. Actually, I agree with you completely. This is a very valid criticism of Cone. 2 years ago, there might have been some validity to him wanting to keep his system "pure" since it was undergoing so much development and the alternatives were very much unproven. To maintain this position today is closing his eyes to reality. To try to "manage the market" has been a big mistake for any company that tried. In a field this large, a closed architecture attitude will eventually cause the company great harm. Look at the success of the Palm Pilot against the mighty Microsoft; I believe that the biggest factor here was the developer community was courted by Palm... And Cone may be making the same mistake by not courting the likes of Paul and John who are delivering some pretty incredible tools to us (not to mention they are giving away the help and the inks they write for are half the price of Cone ink...though this is not about price). Anyhow, you make a good point on forcing customers to buy the ink with the software. I believe that should be the customer choice and that most people should and would at least try the Cone ink, so what would be lost by the good will of allowing customer choice? Tom O'Connell --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Julian Thomas" <julianthomas@t...> wrote: > > > > Any time I have phoned them, I've gotten smart friendly helpful > > service. There is a lot of criticism in the forums comparing Jon to > > Gates... Whatever... They've been great to me. > > > Err, that came from me. I'm not comparing JC to BG. Jon was very helpful to > me when I had the greenies - where the comparison comes in is the marketing > of the product - as in you buy everything or nothing, a complete kit of OS, > email, IE, media player, cis, inks, driver etc etc. Some say that that is to > provide support, but that is the same argument BG usedin his recent US court > cases. My comments are not personal at all, I've found tech support, sales, > BB, JC to be more than helpful - but they won't split their software from > their inks. > > Julian
Message
Re: [Digital BW] inks
2002-01-05 by tomoc
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.