> > I'm not doubting you, but I just haven't seen it, obviously I use a > lot of papers that don't have much bluing, but I've profiled a few > including EEM without problem. This is with ProfilerPro, EyeOne Photo, > and ErgoSoft GPS. > So maybe it's a sftware dependant phenominon? All i1 software is automatic, not sure about the Ergosoft GPS, And the ProfilerPro, definitely not (PP sits in a box unused!) > > > > ...(I now have an > > i1UV, and a Pulse UV in addition to my regular i1, almost time for a > > sale). > > What do you think of the Pulse? I've been suspecting my old Spectrocam > was better than the i1 before it went wonky. Had great software too. > The Pulse hardware is a little different. I need to work on the patch size to try and get charts with a higher patch density per page, if that works I'll probably switch over to it. For now I'm still using the i1UV. As far as accuracy, it seems to be reasonable with the biggest difference between i1UV and DTP20UV being the different UV filter. And so far the support from Xrite has been very good for me. > > I really apreciate that. Let's wait untill my 9800 gets here, along > with StudioPrint support. Then I'll be knee deep in setup and > profiling for weeks. > Tyler > OK, let me know when you want to give things a try.
Message
Re: StudioPrint
2006-01-04 by Greg
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.