When I've had images published in books and magazines I haven't asked the publisher to overprint them with a watermark or anything else to prevent people putting them on a scanner and copy them. From those images I could make commercial size files, large enough for repro at roughly the same size and quality as the printed image. From an image on a web site, at say 600x400 pixels its easy to get a good enough file for web use, or for a smallish print. But anyone who wants to use them seriously off-line is going to contact me for a larger file. I don't think its sensible to worry too much about your on-line images. Yes, they will be downloaded and used, but very seldom in any way that loses you any income. (And if your pictures are good, having them on line will generate income.) I'm happy for students to print out a copy for their essays and most other non-profit uses that people make of my stuff (a few are good enough to write and ask.) I include this: <meta http-equiv="imagetoolbar" content="no"> in the source of every page because I find the image tool bar a nuisance when viewing pages. I wouldn't dream of disabling right click, because it annoys some users and there are legitimate uses of it. Pages that disable it are far less likely to appear in my blog for example, because I have Movable Type on the right-click menu. The other thing I suggest you include on every page (though I think it is enough to put it on the front page of the site) is a normal copyright notice - just like you would in a book. \ufffd 2006, Peter Marshall I sometimes include this in the alt text for each image as well, just as a reminder. I rather feel anything beyond this is paranoia, although this has been whipped up rather by those wanting to market various solutions to what I think is really a non-problem. Regards, Peter Peter Marshall petermarshall@... _________________________________________________________________ My London Diary http://mylondondiary.co.uk/ London's Industrial Heritage: http://petermarshallphotos.co.uk/ The Buildings of London etc: http://londonphotographs.co.uk/ and elsewhere...... Mark Savoia wrote: >Or just do a screen capture of anything at anytime. > >On Jan 5, 2006, at 10:53 AM, Greg wrote: > > > >>I think Firefox would still allow you to grab the images, if not then >>you can probably find them in the cache. >> >> >> > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: OT: Copyright protection of images on a webpage
2006-01-06 by Peter Marshall
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.