I'd be interesting in seeing how the Nanochrome inkset would work running QTR on a 2200. Seems to me that the chief advantage of the 2400 -- the ability to print on glossy papers without the usual UC gloss differential/bronzing problems -- would be disappear. Further, with the Nanochromes you would get greater dmax on both matte and glossy papers. Chris Hargens --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones" <cj@c...> wrote: > > Hello Bruce, > >>In a few days, as soon as my replacement 2400 arrives, I will be > >>loading Nanochrome K (as the black ink), the Epson MK (as the > >>darkest gray), followed by LK, LLK. > > >- why aren't you using the NanoChromes as a set? > >What advantage do you see in using the K3s for the color inks? > > Maybe it's because the Nanos aren't made for the K3 printers - there > is no LLK. > > > Regards, > Clayton > > > Info on black and white digital printing at > http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm >
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Printing On Gloss...Possible with Digital B&W?
2006-01-23 by Chris Hargens
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.