Digital BW, The Print

Thanks for the input, Steve. Are you referring to dmax? I'm not trying
to be argumentative, but how do you account then for Daniel Staver's
post (72934)? Also what about gloss differential/bronzing? The
messages I've read suggest that the Nanochrome inkset outperforms K3
in this area.
You've been working with this inkset. What's your impression?


Chris Hargens 


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale
<stevekale@b...> wrote:
>
> Nanochrome K underperforms Epson K3 PK, although not by a large visual
> amount.  On certain matte papers it seems, judging from some posts
here, to
> be only as good as Eboni.
> 
> 
> > From: Chris Hargens <chargens@s...>
> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> > Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:39:33 -0000
> > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Printing On Gloss...Possible with
Digital B&W?
> > 
> > I'd be interesting in seeing how the Nanochrome inkset would work
> > running QTR on a 2200. Seems to me that the chief advantage of the
> > 2400 -- the ability to print on glossy papers without the usual UC
> > gloss differential/bronzing problems -- would be disappear. Further,
> > with the Nanochromes you would get greater dmax on both matte and
> > glossy papers. 
> > 
> > Chris Hargens
> >
>