Digital BW, The Print

Chris,

NanoChrome on a 2200 does work, and you are right you can print 
glossy and matte, and NO bronzing. Sounds great doesn't it? But wait 
a minute: The K and LK of NanoChrome are rather cold in tone, and can 
be neutralized or taken into the warm spectrum only if you add both 
LM (or M) AND Y. When you add Y you are in rather sticky situation 
becuase the print can swing along the magenta-green axis under 
daylight-flourescent lighting conditions. If you accept slightly 
green prints under fluro lights, you should be fine.

Seeing such a high Dmax AND absolutely no bronzing in a print is a 
joy indeed.

Shilesh

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@...m, "Chris Hargens" 
<chargens@s...> wrote:
>
> I'd be interesting in seeing how the Nanochrome inkset would work
> running QTR on a 2200. Seems to me that the chief advantage of the
> 2400 -- the ability to print on glossy papers without the usual UC
> gloss differential/bronzing problems -- would be disappear. Further,
> with the Nanochromes you would get greater dmax on both matte and
> glossy papers. 
> 
> Chris Hargens
>  
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones"
> <cj@c...> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Bruce,
> > >>In a few days, as soon as my replacement 2400 arrives, I will be
> > >>loading Nanochrome K (as the black ink), the Epson MK (as the
> > >>darkest gray), followed by LK, LLK.
> > 
> > >- why aren't you using the NanoChromes as a set? 
> > >What advantage do you see in using the K3s for the color inks? 
> > 
> > Maybe it's because the Nanos aren't made for the K3 printers - 
there
> > is no LLK.  
> > 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Clayton
> > 
> > 
> > Info on black and white digital printing at    
> > http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
> >
>