Austin Franklin asked, in part, re. MIS quads: > My main concern is WYSIWYG...is that the case with your workflow, > is what is on your screen what comes out the printer? Austin, I've been using MIS VM-hex "quads" too, although I've been using PressReady to print in CMYK mode, and using my own CMYK partitioning curves to get a split-tone look (cool darks, warm lights) somewhat like platinum-palladium prints. I am aware of two ways to get an accurate preview, other than using Jon Cone's system. Alas, both require a spectrophotometer. With my CMYK workflow, I use my spectro to measure the L*a*b values of ink swatches, and to measure dot area curves, then input these readings into Photoshop as a custom ink setup. Then I use the resulting custom ink profile to preview my CMYK images *after* applying the partitioning curves, so I see not only the tonality of the grayscale image, but the subtle hues of warm and cool grays, on my calibrated monitor. I find this preview to be spot-on. If you're using RGB, other list members (like Dave King, Campfire Dan, and Takichi, I think -- excuse please if that's not right) have reported that you can print 729 swatches and use the spectro and Profiler Pro to make an RGB profile (!) for the quad ink set. Then use that profile for PS preview only -- *not* for printing. I have not tried this method, but it has been reported to work well, too. regards, Richard Wolfson
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Best method for printing BW
2002-01-09 by Richard Wolfson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.