Steve Kale replied: According to Epson UK 2nd Tier Support, they don't believe single channel greyscale is a credible photographic printing platform. Pity as it would, presumably, have been easy to maintain. As a former bean counter, I would say ink consumption is the better part of the equation. Probably 98% of my output on my 2200 is BO. The other 6 inks are only use in the cleaning cycles. To top it off the matte black is Eboni not Epson. Epson's profit is not just in the printer business but the consumables business, ink and paper. At $99, the R220 can not be a huge profit center. Work out the cost of Epson inks on a $ per gallon basis and you will see what I mean. David Dorn [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: Epson 4800 vs. 2400 question
2006-02-10 by David M. Dorn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.