> These problems crop up with both warm and cool curves, worse > with the warm, and are not apparent on a calibrated monitor or in > prints made with Epson color ink or black ink only. I don't > understand how the Roark and Brandin curves were created, so > I have no idea how to go about modifying them. So, I'm tweaking > the transfer function instead. I'm aiming for a look similar to what > you get with the Epson black ink only, with plenty of pop and a full > range, but without the dottiness. > > Anyone have any suggestion about how to address these two > issues? Thanks in advance. I'm experiencing similar issues. Previously I was using the Brandin Curves on an 1160. No posterization, but murky, low contrast shadow detail. I'm now using Paul's curves on a 1280 (PC). There seems to be a lot of printer to printer or system to system variations, so in some cases, a bit of curve tweaking might be necessary. I've found that (on my system) the shadows print much lighter that what I see on my (calibrated) monitor. I've done a slight tweak of the RGB portion of the warm curve, dropping the toe and lower mid tones slightly. The resulting print matches the screen image, and the blacks are a lot stronger; quite an improvement, really. This is a crude adjustment, but it does show the potential of print quality you can get from Paul's curves.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Need help refining Roark VM workflow on 1280
2002-01-09 by Moreno Polloni
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.