Epson do not consider BO as a photographic workflow. They consider it a text printing setting. With the 2400 they evolved the driver to improve even its text printing to using the other inks. I don't have a 2400 but rather I bought the 4800. Nonetheless the comparison is likely very valid for potential 2400 purchasers. The 4800 blows the 21/2200 away out of the box. You will not be disappointed. > From: how786 <how786@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 04:38:11 -0000 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Which Printer? > > I'm curious about the 2400. I've read in reviews that it can produce > a darn good B&W print out of the box yet, evidently, it cannot do BO > printing. > I had decided to finally buy one last weekend when Page Computer had > them on sale for $675 with FREE shipping. (It has since gone back up > to their regular price, btw) > > My question is, how do the 2400 prints compare with those made by the > 200 BO or the 2200? And, forgive me, but how is it that the 2200 can > do BO but the 2400 cannot? > > I'm new to this group and am admitedly confused. I hope I did not err > in ordering the 2400. > :< > > Howard
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Which Printer?
2006-02-12 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.