Jerry, > Michael, just a curious question, do you know of ANY other art media > OTHER than inkjet inks that worry people about longevity? Actually yes, individuals in all the other arts have considered longetivity as an issue within the last 25-40 years. > artist's don't even consider this question when making art supply > purchases. Can you even IMAGINE of an oil painter or watercolorist > testing 10 different brands of oil or watercolor paint in the sun > for 3 months to see which faded less? They do consider it when making the purchase of 'professional' vs student grade paints, and pay a premuim for those materials. Main different of course is in the choice of your pigment within a color, some yellows are archival, some not. Same for other colors. This in addition to the medium they choose. > I think its about time we joined all the > other artists and forget about it. If a client ever complains, I'd > just reprint it. Very little cost, happy client. Can't reprint a watercolor. It's a matter of providing artwork created with the best materials available to you that also meet your needs, in conjunction with a collector who understands the limitations of the medium and not just the surface of marketing knowledge. In that way we have joined the modern era of making art. It's the collector (consumer at a lower level) who may be tainting their purchase with an 'investment consideration.' If passion takes you and you create hundreds of works a week, cost may be a factor so you choose 'cheaper' material. If you are fastidious about design and useage then you are likely to create fewer works with 'more' consideration of each piece (and use higher quality material). Seems to me the philosophy we are prone to use is embeded in us regardless of the media, or job, we choose. Sincerely, Cleavis
Message
Archival revisted was...Best method for printing
2002-01-10 by lyonscox
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.