On 21 Feb 2006, at 15:15, sedernb wrote: > Hello, > Thank you in advance for any help that you can provide. I have used > QTR > with an Epson 2200 and I am very impressed. I know someone with an > Epson 3000 that is just sitting around. I know that I could get it for > free or for very little money. The owner did say that it exhibits some > banding, but I am not sure to what degree or what the cause is. > Assuming that the 3000 is in good working order, is it still a viable > quadtone printer if I were to get a quadtone inkset for it and create > my own curves for QTR (I have Eye One Photo, so I have the hardware to > create my own curves)? Or is the larger dot size (compared to today's > pritners) too problematic? Any other issues with this setup? Anybody > out there using such a setup? Again, any input would be greatly > appreciated. > Seder Burns I too am very interested to know what the general feeling is with this. I was going to get Lyson QT but was told that they are to be discontinued and was advised to use Small Gamut instead in my 3000. Lyson reckoned that the 3000 was fine for this purpose and would need no profiling to work with their QT. Drew Made In Scotland On A High Mac! [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Epson 3000 still viable?
2006-02-21 by Andrew Rodger
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.