Hello Duane, Thanks for the reply. Please let me know what inkset you are presently using and if you have used any other inksets previously? Seder --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "dlruckus" <dlruckus@...> wrote: > > Hello Seder. > I believe it is very viable for monochrome work. I am using one for > that purpose and also using QTR with it. With Quad tone properly set > up dots shouldn't be an issue. Larger prints would be best use for it. > > Regards > Duane > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "sedernb" > <sedernb@> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > Thank you in advance for any help that you can provide. I have used QTR > > with an Epson 2200 and I am very impressed. I know someone with an > > Epson 3000 that is just sitting around. I know that I could get it for > > free or for very little money. The owner did say that it exhibits some > > banding, but I am not sure to what degree or what the cause is. > > Assuming that the 3000 is in good working order, is it still a viable > > quadtone printer if I were to get a quadtone inkset for it and create > > my own curves for QTR (I have Eye One Photo, so I have the hardware to > > create my own curves)? Or is the larger dot size (compared to today's > > pritners) too problematic? Any other issues with this setup? Anybody > > out there using such a setup? Again, any input would be greatly > > appreciated. > > Seder Burns > > Photo Education Department Head > > School of Art and Design > > Toledo Museum of Art > > >
Message
Re: Epson 3000 still viable?
2006-02-21 by sedernb
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.