Seder, I began with MIS archival color inks in a 1200, used them also briefly in the 3000 to make a few large color prints and then set up the 3000 with a set of quads based on the Roark/MIS VM or variable tone inks. I use these for most B&W work but sometimes remove the toner and add a 3rd lighter gray in its place. The 3rd gray makes it very similar to the FS or Full Spectrum inkset that MIS sells. I say similar because it is a set I diluted the grays for myself and I worked from a very early version of those inks described by Paul Rourk as he designed them origonaly. I have a fair amount of that inkset left and as soon as it has been used I will update the mix using the most recent full carbon inks available from MIS. I like the 3000 very much specificaly because it affords a very respectable d'max on a couple of inexpensive papers I use.I can get in the range of 1.8-1.9 on one matt paper I use when I drive the printer from QTR. It looks very nice. Those are the only inks I have used to date in the 3000 but I suspect that it can use pretty much anything provided the quad tones are properly diluted for it. Someone on one of these forums with a great deal of experience with 3000's once commented that it could likely print with, I believe the expression was, duck soup. Regards Duane --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "sedernb" <sedernb@...> wrote: > > Hello Duane, > Thanks for the reply. Please let me know what inkset you are > presently using and if you have used any other inksets previously? > Seder > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "dlruckus" > <dlruckus@> wrote: > > > > Hello Seder. > > I believe it is very viable for monochrome work. I am using one for > > that purpose and also using QTR with it. With Quad tone properly set > > up dots shouldn't be an issue. Larger prints would be best use for > it. > > > > Regards > > Duane > > > > > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "sedernb" > > <sedernb@> wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > Thank you in advance for any help that you can provide. I have > used QTR > > > with an Epson 2200 and I am very impressed. I know someone with > an > > > Epson 3000 that is just sitting around. I know that I could get > it for > > > free or for very little money. The owner did say that it exhibits > some > > > banding, but I am not sure to what degree or what the cause is. > > > Assuming that the 3000 is in good working order, is it still a > viable > > > quadtone printer if I were to get a quadtone inkset for it and > create > > > my own curves for QTR (I have Eye One Photo, so I have the > hardware to > > > create my own curves)? Or is the larger dot size (compared to > today's > > > pritners) too problematic? Any other issues with this setup? > Anybody > > > out there using such a setup? Again, any input would be greatly > > > appreciated. > > > Seder Burns > > > Photo Education Department Head > > > School of Art and Design > > > Toledo Museum of Art > > > > > >
Message
Re: Epson 3000 still viable?
2006-02-22 by dlruckus
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.