BTW - I now have a Nikon 9000 scanner and the panoramic 120 negs fit perfectly into the holder BUT with Nikon-Scan neither Chris nor I have been able to get the scanner to recognize the long negs and Nikon tek support has told both of us it can't be done. Now the question - does anyone know if this is possible in any way, with, for example, Vue-Scan? --- Michael Vendrell <mjvendrell2@...> wrote: > My studio-mate Chris Faust does medium format > panoramic photography - quite well I might add. You > can view his work via his link at our Studio 210 > site. > (Maybe if I can get a bit of time off from my > medical > practice - I'll get something posted too!) There are > also huge collages of his work in the MSP airport. > > > When i got my previous generation Canon flatbed I > made > a "carrier" for his negs using 8-ply black > matte-board > that fit into the same space as the 35mm strip > holder > and it worked OK. We merely taped the neg by its > edges > onto the holder with 3M photo tape. He later cut a > better one out of black plastic of a similar > thickness > which is quite a bit stiffer but still uses the > tape. > He gets entirely acceptable scans even for large > poster sized prints especially using the Silver-Fast > software since the Canon-Scan software (how to put > this delicately?) sucks. > > Keeping the 8x10" big boys flat is going to be more > challenging. I'll probably give one of these simple > methods a try but am certainly open to any good > ideas > - especially if based upon success although sharing > the "agony of defeat" might spare me some pain. > > Thanks...Michael > > --- mwesley3 <mwesley250@...> wrote: > > > Ken, Gary, > > > > A company called "invent it" used to sell > > refrigerator magnet > > material for inkjet printing in 8.5X11 sheets that > > was roughly the > > same thickness as the flatbed negative holders. > Some > > people had > > sucess cutting out negative holders and using the > > magnetic force to > > hold the two pieces together with the negative in > > between. Wet > > mounting is prefered but with an 8X10 neg on on an > > letter size > > scanner it might be tough. > > > > Martin > > > > --- In > DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, > > "Ken Carney" > > <kcarney1@...> wrote: > > > > > > Gary, > > > > > > I have the 4990 and it is a good scanner, > > especially at the > > price. It is > > > not going to compete with a professional drum > > scan, but for me it > > is "good > > > enough". I do have an issue scanning b&w 8x10 > > negs, in that > > the "film > > > guide" supplied by Epson for that scanner is > > worthless, even > > before my cat > > > chewed it in half. It does not elevate the > > negative off the > > scanner glass, > > > as the 4x5 holders do. Therefore you will need > to > > find some way > > to deal > > > with Newton rings, such as Kami fluid, or > > fabricating a negative > > holder that > > > will hold the negative flat and off the glass. > > > > > > Ken > > > > > (snip) > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Flatbed scanner
2006-02-23 by Michael Vendrell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.