> > So is everyone saying that when a company invests time, creativity, and > money to invent a unique (or at least particular) design, that they should > let others use their creation and not get paid? No. The questions are much more complex. The action is at the interface of, for example, patents and antitrust. It's a huge field. See for example, http://www.ftc.gov/os/comments/intelpropertycomments/index.htm Scholars will be debating these issues forever. One doesn't solve these things quickly or summarily -- and that includes the ITC in the context of an Epson complaint. (And certainly not here and not me.) Stopping the ITC from unwisely stepping into the middle of this with only one side of the story is the modest action that I think is doable -- and I'm trying to do. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Lawsuit -- MIS
2006-02-25 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.