Not to make an important point glibly, but as I recall it (over the
years), you've consistently defended EPSON's (razor/blade) sales model:
"illegal tying" included.
So, IMHO, your supposed defense of intellectual property here seems
more incidental, fortuitous, and even chimeric than genuine.
While you are sober and even-handed on other points, your handling of
and analysis of issues relating to issues relating to EPSON in my memory
seem to come down always on the side of EPSON, particularly when it
relates to allowing them to choose any business model they please or
their responsibilities to consumers.
That makes your current defense of "intellectual property" seem more
than a tad suspect, and perhaps, less grounded in principle than legal
and marketplace rationality. Unless we are going to accept complete
laissez faire marketplace as a viable option -- As an aside: given
modern corporate market power, only a complete ignoramus could believe a
laissez faire system is even distantly viable. So, I DO NOT think you,
or any serious reader, REALLY believes in that (except perhaps in some
theoretical utopian �riginal position" dreamworld)...
Bob Frost wrote:
>Greg,
>
>Are they like these ? (for the 2100/2200/1800/2400/etc)
>
>http://www.digital4to.com/
>
>The 'Anatomy', 'Rheology', and 'Repletion' sections give the full details of
>the construction, problems, and refilling techiques.
>
>Bob Frost.
>
--
Keith
Keith Krebs
"Just some guy," caretaker of the Multiverse's largest EPSON printer
User Community (highly recommended by Vogon Poets and MegaDodo
Publications), at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EPSON_Printers/
and the Multiverse's largest Canon printer User Community at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Canon-printers
"For the rest of you out there, the secret is to bang the rocks together
guys"
****************************************************************
CONFIDENTIALITY & COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
This e-mail message, including attachments and contents, is � Copyright,
Keith Krebs, 2001-2004, All Rights Reserved. It is expressly for the
sole use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential and
privileged information. Absent the express written authorization of the
author, any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, transfer, or
distribution is explicitly prohibited and taken at your own risk. If you
are not, or are unsure whether you are, the intended recipient, please
contact the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the original
message. Violations will be prosecuted to the FULL extent allowed under
applicable civil and criminal law. Imagery published or distributed in
violation of these conditions shall be subject to a $1500/image
liquidated damages charge, in addition to any applicable Copyright
violation penalties.
POV IMage Service Banner
****************************************************************
{ The P.O.V. Image Service Website is still at http://www.p-o-v-image.com/ }
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson files lawsuits against cartridge resellers
2006-02-25 by Editor, P.O.V. Image Service
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.