--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Frank Vincent" <hollidaypr@...> wrote: > > I think there are a couple of questions to be answered here. > > First, what equipment is necessary to prevent reasonable hardware > limitation? My answer has only come this year, for black and white archival > digital printing. Since I hardly ever print bigger than 8 x 10, even when I > did darkroom work for myself, the choice is easy. Epson R220 printer, MIS > carbon inks, and my trusty Finepix 3.2 mp camera. Download Picasa II for > free, and there you go! Whatever appears before your camera can get to a > black and white print, even without color converting. > > Second question. What skill is necessary to recognize good images that > pass before your camera? Here's the part that requires skill, taste, risk, > luck, experience, fear, and perseverence. The human application of > technology is what we seek. How does the person communicate? What is the > message in that simple image? Did I miss something? Yes Frank, only one thing,. . . . time. It's a slow cooking kind of thing. Other than that, right on, right on. Jules > > My machinery prints snapshots or compositions equally well. It's my side of > the camera that takes so much labor. > > Frank Vincent > > > > > > > > Does anyone really want to tell me that it will require years of > > > experience and experimentation to get a system that will take a good > > > B&W image in screen, and make a large, gallery quality, archival print > > > from it? >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] state of the art archival b/w digital out put
2006-03-10 by lulalake_1999
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.