I've been scanning b/w negatives for some years with various scanners and for the last few with a Minolta Dimage Scan Multi Pro. This has covered a pretty wide range of films and developers as I've been working with images from around 30 years. I've not had great problems with any of them, although I have found Vuescan to generally be better than the Minolta software. I've also normally used the Scanhancer plastic diffuser in recent years. So it might be worth trying Vuescan with other scanners. My favourite black and white film for scanning is actually Ilford XP2, but were I to be wanting to use conventional silver negative films I'd be strongly tempted to look at reversal processing, possibly with the use of a sulphide developer to give a silver sulphide image which should be considerably more stable than a silver one. I'd also look for a film with a polyester rather than a triacetate base if longevity was important. I'd be unhappy about having to send film to Denver for processing, and would prefer a process that I could buy and do myself, or published formulae that could be used. I have used some of the older reversal processes but only to create slides for lectures, which was considerably cheaper than using Scala and avoided the colours added to b/w by most colour transparency film. Regards Peter Peter Marshall petermarshall@... +44 (0)1784 456474 31 Budebury Rd, STAINES, Middx, TW18 2AZ, UK _________________________________________________________________ My London Diary http://mylondondiary.co.uk/ London's Industrial Heritage: http://petermarshallphotos.co.uk/ The Buildings of London etc: http://londonphotographs.co.uk/ and elsewhere...... Michael Vendrell wrote: > Paul,Ginny, et al: I'm planning on giving the dr5 > reversal processing a try for some selected B&W films > as well. There's a rather extensive list of films > with their characteristics on his site which makes for > impressive reading but I don't as yet have direct > experience - anyone? I know it has been discussed > before, but does anyone have further thoughts about > scanning B&W film positives vs negatives in a scanner > such as the Nikon 9000? > > --- Paul Roark <paul.roark@...> wrote: > > >>> ... XTOL produces a less 'dramatic' image than >>> >> HC-110, >> >>> but lends an almost luminous quality...with >>> >> be >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Great Photographic Artists [was Scanning 35mm vs digital camer
2006-03-29 by Peter Marshall
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.