I will third that. The Kodak CN film does well too. What I like about it with the Howtek scanner is that it helps in the extreme highlights which helps with these drum scanners that do a better job with shadow detail. The shadows don't have the interent contrast of textural detail that the better Tri-X or TMax type films have, but with cuves in Photoshop we have so much more control of that then in the darkroom era when I wouldn't use the CN at all except for portraits. All in all they produce the smoothest result for medium and small formats. I like to shoot it on the RZ67. They don't make it in 4x5 do they? John > ... > > My favourite black and white film for scanning is actually Ilford XP2, > > Me too, particularly for 120. Not sure how well the grainier shadows > on problem negs would look from 35mm to larger prints. > But the 120 I have done, people think it's 4x5. > One of it'as greatest features is it's amazing upper exposure > latitude. You can overexpose like crazy in high contrast scenes, and > it gets it all ithout blocking up. Then, it's easy to scan because > that density is dye, not hard silver grain. > In some ways it may be a nearly ideal B&W film for digital. > On the other hand, some people seem to hate it, there you go. > Tyler >
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Great Photographic Artists [was Scanning 35mm vs digital camer
2006-03-30 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.