> > > My favourite black and white film for scanning is ... Ilford XP2, ... > > Me too, particularly for 120. Not sure how well the grainier shadows > > on problem negs would look from 35mm to larger prints. ... > I will third that. The Kodak CN film does well too. ... Just to voice a contrary opinion, I've used T400CN for years in medium format when I need a fast film, but it's about to be replaced. In my Fuji Zi, it's what has passed for a "snapshot" camera for me when I know I'll be needing speed, like on family trips. On the other hand, some of my best 16 x 20 landscapes have been done with it on these occasions. That said, the 16 x 20 prints have taken an awful lot of work to deal with grain in the skies, and the resolution is just barely sufficient for a perfectly sharp 16 x 20 from medium format. Now I mostly take my little Canon Rebel XT when I need a fast camera that can barely do a 16 x 20. The digital's lack of grain is the main plus for the Canon. Neither, of course, is close to mf Tech Pan on a tripod. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Great Photographic Artists [was Scanning 35mm vs digital camer
2006-03-30 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.