Digital BW, The Print

When I tested the range of Pictorico papers I concluded that the 
Pictorico Photo Gallery Hi-gloss White Film gave the ugliest prints I'd 
ever seen. I can imagine it being popular for display graphics but never 
for fine art prints.

I think the publication of this piece shows a complete lack of editorial 
judgement by the web site concerned, it should clearly have had a 
heading that marked it as advertising material.

Regards

Peter Marshall
petermarshall@...   
_________________________________________________________________
My London Diary	              http://mylondondiary.co.uk/
London's Industrial Heritage: http://petermarshallphotos.co.uk/
The Buildings of London etc:  http://londonphotographs.co.uk/
and elsewhere......



john dean wrote:
> I suspect a lot of that was true about the physics of the surface and
> ink density, and K3, despite the ad for Imageprint, Epson, and
> Pictorico. It could have been stated in one paragraph. But I can't
> help but think that these "revolutionary" advancements are wasted on
> such amazingly pedestrian photography. Now that is technology wasted.
>
> John 
>
>
>