Digital BW, The Print

On Apr 7, 2006, at 9:35 AM, John Moody wrote:

> I'm not so sure, the OBAs certainly change the apparent paper  
> color, and
> that is due to the UV excited fluorescence.
> John Moody
>

>   I see now why ColorBurst recommends (actually
> requires) the UV filtered hardware solution.
>
> Carl

I'm not so sure, either.  I have a non-UV i1, and I'm reprofiling  
papers for MIS Pro inks in a 7600, printing with ColorBurst.  I'm  
profiling with ProfileMaker 5, which has new targets and seems to be  
profiling much better than earlier versions.  Or maybe it's the ink.   
Or both.  In any case, I'm getting very good results, at least in  
color, and one duo-toned-style RGB b&w image so far.  All look  
excellent to me- no surprises so far.  Admittedly the sample number  
is small so far, but then if a problem with lack of filtration were  
that significant, I think I would have seen it already.

James