EPSON is getting what they deserve on this one. If they hadn't done
everything in their power to prevent the average comsumer from refilling
cartridges, the claim would be near moot. If you could easily refill a
cartridge, the fact that it went empty and forced you to buy a new one,
earlier than you actually needed to, would be nearly irrelevant. It
wouldn't much matter how much ink was still in a cartridge when it
indicated "empty" if you could refill it.
It looks like the deception necessitated for keeping the cartridge
profit margin is beginning to undercut the sales model they chose.
I can say there likely are more lawsuits coming aimed at other parts of
their pricing model. I believe EPSON even knows that (including some
specific legal actions), as their own (Seiko-EPSON) recent stock
prospectus / annual report notes that profits may fall if they are
unable to protect their sales of cartridges by excluding alternative
cartridges/inks.
--
Keith
Keith Krebs
"Just some guy," caretaker of the Multiverse's largest EPSON printer
User Community (highly recommended by Vogon Poets and MegaDodo
Publications), at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EPSON_Printers/
and the Multiverse's largest Canon printer User Community at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Canon-printers
"For the rest of you out there, the secret is to bang the rocks together
guys"
****************************************************************
CONFIDENTIALITY & COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
This e-mail message, including attachments and contents, is © Copyright,
Keith Krebs, 2001-2004, All Rights Reserved. It is expressly for the
sole use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential and
privileged information. Absent the express written authorization of the
author, any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, transfer, or
distribution is explicitly prohibited and taken at your own risk. If you
are not, or are unsure whether you are, the intended recipient, please
contact the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the original
message. Violations will be prosecuted to the FULL extent allowed under
applicable civil and criminal law. Imagery published or distributed in
violation of these conditions shall be subject to a $1500/image
liquidated damages charge, in addition to any applicable Copyright
violation penalties.
POV IMage Service Banner
****************************************************************
{ The P.O.V. Image Service Website is still at http://www.p-o-v-image.com/ }
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [Digital BW] different Epson law suit
2006-04-15 by Editor, P.O.V. Image Service
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.