Tyler, I use Neat Image Pro+; having the plugin for CS2 is great since you can use the History Brush to paint in the desired effect and amount where you want it. But I find it difficult to see how you compare these programs, other than for usability. NI has literally millions of different settings that could be used. How do you choose which one to compare with which one of another program, or do you just use the default settings. Someone said NI can be too agressive. Well, it (and the others) can if you set all sliders high. But since there are 12 sliders that each vary from 0-100%, you can set them to taste, from no effect to millions of different effects. There are also more than a dozen different preset effects for starters! Bob Frost. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> As posted back then, we downloaded and tested demos of all the major noise/grain plugins about a year ago. Personlly, I thought the Noiseware filter was the best in terms of image quality. But Noise Ninja was a very close second, some people could not see the difference, and had an interface that was easier and faster to learn up front so we got it. They both beat out Neat Image, which was still pretty good. You can do as much bad as good with these filters...
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Anyone Try Neat Image?
2006-04-22 by Bob Frost
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.