Steve, My recollection is that in the past you've advocated using the ABW default "darker" setting. Have you changed your mind, and if so - why? Or has something else changed - or is my memory at fault?! Steve Gledhill http://www.virtuallygrey.co.uk/ --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale <stevekale@...> wrote: > > Profiling a linear device will be better so I'd use either the Norm or Light > setting (both for printing the test chart for profiling and on an on-going > basis) and create an ICC profile using that data. > > > > From: edrudolpho <erudolph@...> > > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > > Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 15:51:26 -0000 > > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: ABW users: which ABW setting do you use? > > > > One other note, maybe of interest. After printing 21-step wedges for the Dark > > and for the > > Norm and for the Light settings, and examining the Measure Tool text files, > > the Norm and > > Light ABW settings gave very linear L values. The Dark setting gave L values > > with marked > > drop off in the last three steps. > > > > Ed >
Message
[Digital BW] Re: ABW users: which ABW setting do you use?
2006-04-23 by Steve Gledhill
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.