--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> wrote: ............ > If the discussion were severely limited to say, 8x10 prints, or maybe > portraiture only, or both, things get more straightforward very quickly. > I made a print here for an excellent photographer, very graphic and > abstract, motion blur, nighttime, shot from a train window with a very > small digital point a shoot... she had me make a 30x40. > It's beautiful. For what it's worth West Coast Imaging has a print size chart in relation to megapixels of cameras. http://westcoastimaging.com/wci/page/info/FAQ/uploadfaq/printsize.html From my own experience, I have the Canon 350 XT 8MP, print size depends on subject matter and the paper it's printed on matte or photo. For me portraits seem to print larger than say a landscape as portraits have much smoother areas and are not under constant scrutiny for fine detail...while landscapes print smaller as there is more finer detail and many viewers will walk up to a landscape and check for nose sharpness of the image. Both subjects seem to print bigger with matte paper than photo paper. Also I've done some image stitching and print quality increases incredibly well!
Message
Re: [Digital BW] analog/digital Megapixels
2006-05-02 by John Vitollo
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.