I noticed a significant increase in high frequency, fine detail resolution in landscape images after the AA/IR filter package was removed from my 350 XT and replaced with an IR pass filter for dedicated IR work. On May 1, 2006, at 10:39 PM, John Vitollo wrote: > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley" > <tyler@...> wrote: > ............ >> If the discussion were severely limited to say, 8x10 prints, or maybe >> portraiture only, or both, things get more straightforward very >> quickly. >> I made a print here for an excellent photographer, very graphic and >> abstract, motion blur, nighttime, shot from a train window with a >> very >> small digital point a shoot... she had me make a 30x40. >> It's beautiful. > > For what it's worth West Coast Imaging has a print size chart in > relation to megapixels of > cameras. > > http://westcoastimaging.com/wci/page/info/FAQ/uploadfaq/printsize.html > > From my own experience, I have the Canon 350 XT 8MP, print size > depends on subject > matter and the paper it's printed on – matte or photo. > > For me portraits seem to print larger than say a landscape as > portraits have much > smoother areas and are not under constant scrutiny for fine > detail...while landscapes print > smaller as there is more finer detail and many viewers will walk up > to a landscape and > check for nose sharpness of the image. Both subjects seem to print > bigger with matte > paper than photo paper. > > Also I've done some image stitching and print quality increases > incredibly well!
Message
Re: [Digital BW] analog/digital Megapixels
2006-05-02 by Carl Schofield
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.