Digital BW, The Print

I agree with this wholeheartedly. But primarily, I don't see the need
to fix something that only looks irritating when lit in such a way
that you can't look at the image anyway. ???
More to the point, I doubt there is such a glass. Others could comment
on sprays, but I've yet to see a post here with an "this paper/spray
is it!" exclaimation.
On other papers over the years, I've played with Krylon, Lascaux
(sp?), Golden, and Print Guard. I found no particular advantage, but
mostly, just plane hated working with sprays of questionable toxicity
and environmental impact. They all smelled like they wouldn't pass the
canary test, and my dog ran away from them.
Tyler

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Cort Anderson
<cort@...> wrote:
>
> I just don't understand the need to try and exactly duplicate the  
> look of a silver print with inkjet. Yes, inkjet prints on matte  
> papers have their own unique look, what is wrong with it? What if all  
> through out the history of photography the main concern was to make  
> all new technology look just like the old technology, where would we be?
> 
> cort
> 
> On May 17, 2006, at 6:30 PM, bobbysandstrom wrote:
> 
> > When viewing silver rag under the proper lighting, you can NOT tell  
> > the difference between an
> > HSR made on a 4800 with K3 inks and a traditional Silver Gelatin FB  
> > print. The obvious telltale
> > sign is the paper surface when viewed under the wrong angle of  
> > light. This got me wondering
> > if there exists a glass that could be used to frame that would  
> > conceal the surface texture. Or,
> > is there a spray that'll do that without killing the glow of the  
> > print.
>