To be picky and honest, I don't think any of them quite nailed it. For surface quality only, I'm liking SR the best of the 3, so you may not like the others much in that regard. Incorporating a surface with a natural feel into these new coatings must be troublesome. But the fact that these three papers are here is a good sign for the future. Color gamut with the pearl looks great. T --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "john dean" <deanwork2003@...> wrote: > > Thanks Tyler, > > We're very curious and that info helps. I guess for visual surface > character, the size of the print is going to play a big role too. I > know I don't like Silver Rag that much in sizes smaller than 16x20, > but love it from there on up. > > John > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley" > <tyler@> wrote: > > > > More, for what it's worth. > > Max densities, 9800, RIP, PK > > > > SilverRag- C) 2.389 M) 1.942 Y) 1.681 K) 2.294 > > FibaPrintGloss C) 2.374 M) 1.943 Y) 1.797 K) 2.401 > > HahnemühlePearl- C) 2.413 M) 1.96 Y) 1.832 K) 2.257 > > > > (paper density removed, unlimited) > > > > All pretty close really, curious that the H paper gets higher color > > density but lower K. > > After seeing some images on the Pearl, to me the very fine stipple > > texture is apparent compared to the other two, but the Innova has > > "larger" texture. > > More to come, I'll just keep yacking... > > Tyler > > www.custom-digital.com > > >
Message
Re: Mule Pearl
2006-05-24 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.