I have recent #s from the UTFS setup with Premier Premium matt and
Epson DS matt.
For PPDSM they are: K=1.71 d'log,
C=1.43
M=0.70
Y=0.56
For EPDSM they are: K=1.66
C=1.39
M=0.71
Y=0.56
These are for the same QTR conditions but using a 3000. I would think
that aside from slight differences due to larger dot size on the 3000
the densities should be similar across printers. I haven't set up for
the UTFSN as yet.
Hope this is helpful.
Regards
Duane
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, John Custodio
<custodiojohn@...> wrote:
>
>
> Epson 4000, FSN C, M, Y on the left side, FS C, M, Y
> on the right side (in the LC, LM, LK positions), Eboni
> Black. Using QTR. Hahnemuehle Photo Rag 308.
>
> QTR ink separation page printed at 100%.
> Eye One spectro.
> 100% densities read:
>
> Eboni 1.71
> FSN-C 1.24 Lab a=-0.5 b=-0.2
> FSN-M .53 Lab a=0.3 b=-6.7
> FSN-Y .36 Lab a=0.2 b=-4.4
> FS-C 1.31
> FS-M .49
> FS-Y .36
>
> I've used FSN and FS on this machine before with no
> problem. What seems wrong is:
>
> The FSN-M and Y seem too blue (note high negative b
> numbers) while the FSN-C is close to neutral.
>
> The dark grays for both FSN and FS should be darker
> (density around 1.5?). Also for both FSN and FS it
> seems there should be more of a density difference
> between the light grays and middle grays (M and Y).
>
> I used to know the 100% densities on HPR of Piezotone
> Selenium inks when I used to had them in my printer,
> but that was a long time ago and I don't have those
> test targets anymore.
>
> What should these numbers be and what about the blue
> FSN? I'm suspecting I got bottles with the wrong ink.
> (The bottles are labeled FSN-C, FSN-M, etc.). I will
> be contacting MIS on Monday.
>
> -John
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>Message
Re: Something wrong with new batch FS/FSN?
2006-06-03 by dlruckus
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.