Unless you have seen aspen trees back lit in person, it is hard to appreciate the "illuminated from both sides look". I know that AA used all kinds of darkroom magic to make his prints. I've also heard that he complained about Moon Rise being a "bitch" to print. Ansel would love digital and especially Epson printers! Maybe he is looking down upon us with great jealosy? John Nollendorfs --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Bruce" <brosin1@...> wrote: > > One of the AA "Aspen" prints that I saw appeared to be heavily > "ferricyanided" (i.e. chemically bleached). I don't know if it was by AA > print or by an assistant. High quality duotone litho prints of this same > picture looked better to me than the silver-gelatin print because the > printing process moderated the bleaching artifacts. Bleaching can really > make or break some prints, but you are always on the razors edge of make or > break. IMHO Bruce Barnbaum is a master of the technique. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Phil Morse" <pmorse@...> > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 5:34 PM > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Moonrise - was Signing prints question > > > This is probably OT in this discussion ;-) but in most of AA's 'Aspens' > images the tree trunks appear to be illuminated from both sides but not the > front. Explaination please? This has always bothered me. > > Phil Morse >
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Moonrise - was Signing prints question
2006-06-04 by sinar001
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.