John, You will get a variety of replies here. I have been using a 1280 with MS UT2 inks for several years and am very pleased with the results. I use Paul Roark's curves and profiles (where available) and QTR. I print primarily on matte paper using the Eboni black ink. While I am reluctant to say so for fear of disturbing the powers that be, clogs have not been a serious problem. Their frequency seems to be cartridge specific and at worst, clearing the printer requires four or five cleaning cycles. I do not print every day or even every week and have come back after a few weeks without a major problem. While I will trade up to a 2400 when the 1280 goes, for now I am a happy customer. The capabilities of the printer and inks far exceed my own. Steve --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Johnny Kurtz" <designtonica@...> wrote: > > Hello, > > I have been reading this group for about a year now and have learned > so much, thank you all! > > My question is prompted by my need for a larger format printer. I > have been using an Epson C86 for two years, with the MIS EZW > Ultratone ink cartridges, not the CFS. > > I am strongly leaning toward a refurbished 1280 along with the $100 > reabate that expires 07/01. > > Would this be a wise choice for a tight budget,printing color and/or > B&W using MIS CFS systems? > > Also, is MIS the best ink choice or should I look at the Lyson and > Media St. CFS systems also? > > Any insight and direction is greatly appreciated. > > Regards, > John >
Message
Re: Is the 1280 still a viable solution?
2006-06-21 by Stephen Kobrin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.