Wasn¹t this thought to be the same paper as the Da Vinci? I¹ve been a little out of touch recently but that is certainly my recollection. But it must be wrong because the Da Vinci paper I tested with was simply awful re bronzing and surface texture. From: Tyler Boley <tyler@...> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 03:10:41 -0000 To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Innova FibaGloss Warmtone 300gsm --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> , K2 Chittin <k2@...> wrote: > > I thought you all might like to know that Innova has produced a > warm-toned version of FibaGloss... Geez, we've been trying to tell them for way too long that if they came out with a nice warm fine art paper to fill the gap left by the non-archival, and finally non-available, but very pretty Concorde Rag they'd have a winner. So they can quickly get this to market, and not that? Maybe this is just the existing paper without the OBAs, so easy to gear up. Results from my tests so far, good traditional printmakers are responding to Fibagloss best, Silver Rag 2nd but think the whites are too dirty, no votes for fine art pearl yet at all... Expecting more opinions though. Tyler [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Innova FibaGloss Warmtone 300gsm
2006-06-30 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.