Hey Bob I might give Hawk Mountain a try as soon as I've saved some money and actually use up my current batch of paper. I've dropped a significant amount of money in past week on the new printer and additional inks. In the meantime I've just figure out that Red River Aurora Art is nearly as economical as EEM for proofing. Fact is, RR's Aurora Art is only $0.51 per sheet. That it's double sided means it comes in at only $0.255 per side. The one-sided EEM is $0.23 per sheet. I already use the RR Aurora Art as my primary paper, so it just makes sense to use it for proofing, too. Also, most proofs turn out nice enough to file in a photo album or give away to family and friends. Those proofs might as well be on the better paper. Kevin --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Marsolais" <bob@...> wrote: > > Has anyone tried Hawk Mountains's papers? They are 100% cotton and > acid-free. Clayton identified three of their papers as category A > papers. I just printed a UT2 inkset print on their Peregrine Velvet > 250 and compared it to HPR. I used QTR's EEM curves and the Peregrine > had sharper details than HPR printed with the HPR curves. The paper > is ever so slightly cooler than HPR. But it's major advantage to me > is that it is significantly cheaper than HPR. Their website is > http://www.hawkmtnartpapers.com/. They have a $20 sample pack and a > free swatch book. (I am not affiliated with them, just like the > papers I've tried so far.) > > Bob Marsolais >
Message
RR "Aurora Art" is Better for Proofing than EEM !
2006-08-15 by Kevin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.