Isn't "profile - same as source" the problem? If working on a file that is DG20%, won't something like DG 10% as a printer profile be needed to match monitor and print? I got this from Clayton's article #4 years back. Or is it too late at night and I'm missing something? Bob Michaels --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones" <cj@...> wrote: > > Hello Mo, > > >Converted color digicam file. > >Profile is dot gain 20%. > > > >I have tried to print in Adobe RGB with the saturation change to > >essentially BW, same outcome. > > > >I see what you are getting at however. Possibly the profiling > >workflow is in error and the printer is looking at a different image > >when printing. > > Well I was just searching for any clues. Everything sounds fine, no > red flags. Does the 1280 driver have an ink density setting of any > sort? Sorry, I don't know what else to suggest other than to continue > double checking everything. There has to be a reason, just have to > find it. > > Regards, > Clayton > > > Info on black and white digital printing at > http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm >
Message
Re: 1280 BO printing looks too light
2006-08-22 by Bob Michaels
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.