Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Cone v. MIS

2006-08-23 by Paul Roark

That message was not the one I had in mind.  There is also at least one
UC-based formula out there, I believe.

 

With the advent of the LLK, we can probably make all my inksets from Epson
inks.

 

I've also published a dilution base that uses only disclosed chemicals in
the UC inkset.  So, the chances of incompatibilies are minimized.  I've put
this in a short pdf on relative viscosity comparisons and the method I use.
See http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/Viscosity_Comparisons.pdf

 

Paul

www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.paulroark.com/>  

 

 

  _____  

From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of dlruckus
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 8:17 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Cone v. MIS

 

Daniela.
Try Message #23225. It refers to a UC based Quad formula from Paul.

Regards
Duane

--- In DigitalBlackandWhit
<mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>
eThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark"
<paul.roark@...> wrote:
>
> Daniela,
> 
> 
> 
> It was on this list, but I don't know the message #. I did the exercise
> fairly early to be sure there was an alternative to MIS pigments in case
> those prices were increased unduly. As it happens, MIS did not raise
> prices, so my incentives to have second sources decreased substantially.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Paul
> 
> www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.paulroar <http://www.paulroark.com/> k.com/>

> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _____ 
> 
> From: DigitalBlackandWhit
<mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>
eThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhit
<mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>
eThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> dgattarino
> Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 7:04 AM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhit
<mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>
eThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Cone v. MIS
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > (I have published entire formulas for making B&W inksets from Epson
> inks.
> > However, no major player has opted to pick them up due to the cost
> of the
> > inputs.)
> > 
> 
> Hello Paul,
> 
> where did you publish the formulas you mentioned in your post?
> I am doing several experiments myself and like to compare with yours.
> Thanks.
> 
> Cheers
> Daniela
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.