Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally

2002-01-17 by Austin Franklin

Hi Jerry,

> Austin, then a question comes to mind. If you see in front of you 2
> prints of a cat, close up, taken with the sharpest macro lens available,

...as I've said, the sharpest lense won't give you any advantage with a
digital camera.

> and you and everyone else who sees it tells you that the quality is as
> good as film, what am I to believe?

Well, those that think it is, believe it is!  Since I haven't seen it, I
can't tell you much about it.

> I don't see any lack of detail in
> the digital print compared to the film print, and both are very sharp.

I am sure they are both very sharp!  I don't believe the detail is the same
though.

> I
> actually prefer the digital print.  what am I missing here?

The difference between sharpness and detail...  See the links Mark Carpenter
posted and that should give you an idea of what I have been talking about.

> I'm printing
> the digital at 300 DPI, and it was rezzed up in Genuine Fractals, which
> is an amazing tool!

Yes it is!

Regards,

Austin

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.