Digital BW, The Print

I have the same experience with the FSN inks I bought for my 3000 printer.
The C is greenish, the M is purplish and has almost the same density as Y,
and Y is also too purplish, but much closer to neutral than M. Basically the
inkset as I received it is useless. I've told MIS about it, and I'm
returning them samples of the inks now so they can do some testing.

I have to agree with you, pure carbon inks seems like a better idea at this
point.

--
Daniel Staver
http://daniel.staver.no


> When UT-FSN was first released, I wanted to switch away from 
> the original FSN I was using. With much trepidation, I made 
> the switch to get better lightfast inkset. Alas, I found 
> excatly the same thing; UT- FSN was definitely magenta heavy. 
> The regular FSN was better at the cool end of neutral. I 
> spoke to Bob at MIS, and he was adamant that UT-FSN and FSN 
> should have similar color. I just gave up at that point.