D50 has long been the standard in viewing booths because humans (on average) perceive equal amounts of RGB light as "neutral" and are better at comparing color under a white light source they perceive as "neutral", as well as being better at comparing colors which are both illuminated under the same white light source. Humans have a tough time seeing two colors which are exactly the same under differing white light sources. Humans see them as different colors. So the trick here for the human brain is when comparing colors, to view them under the same white light source. By this I am of course referring to temperature. The work done by the CIE decades ago measured human's perception of what was a neutral white light and discovered it was 5000k. So the industry naturally built upon 5000k. That is all common knowledge of course. But with that said we realized that D65 or 6500k flat screens are now the norm and we had a number of viewing booths made for us that are fully adjustable and come with D65 (6500k) illumination. This allows the user to set a viewing booth next to their calibrated D65 monitor and adjust the light level of the booth to the light level of the monitor. The brain is best suited at that point for comparing print to monitor because the white points are similar. If interested you can find them here: http://shopping.netsuite.com/s.nl/c.362672/sc.14/category.232/.f Look for the D65 models. Jon Cone InkjetMall --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale <stevekale@...> wrote: > > D50 is the graphics standard for print illumination. Lighting booths are > most often D50. When you make ICC profiles, your spectrophotometer most > likely illuminates the test chart with D50 illumination. It¹s logical to > have all of these consistent. Having said all that, the human eye is very > good at adapting for differences in white point. As a result, you are > likely better off using your display¹s native whitepoint when calibrating it > as it will likely produce a more consistent greyscale. Even if you choose > to switch to D50 you will get used to it very quickly and soon a flick to > D65 will look awful at first. Where do you display your prints? If indoors > and lit with normal household lighting then the illumination will more than > likely be way below D50... > > > > From: joaskild <joaskild@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:05:44 -0000 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [Digital BW] D50 or D65 calibration prints & screen calibration? > > > > > > > I have always calibrated my screen to D65 (with basicocolor display + eye > one pro) and also > the prints profil with basicocolor print3c. I am having a problem that my > printprofels are > always a bit to dark and I called to Basicocolor for adwice. They told that > I should use D50 on > the screen and prints profils and that they would be lighter? Does anybady > know what > happens if I change all to the D50 Daylight. Will all my files now look a > bit more yellow? I don > ´t totaly understand this. When I stodyed photography we learnd that D65 was > normal > daylight. > > So before I start to change my profile workflow to D50, I like to ask if its > a good idea and > what changes I can expickt. > > My main problem was that to profiles are a bit darker wich I just fix by a > curve in Photoshop > but when you make printing via Indesign you have a problem. > > Thanks > > Joakim > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] D50 or D65 calibration prints & screen calibration?
2006-08-31 by Jon Cone
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.