Ernst, I agree that it is the level of illumination for both screen and viewing that is critical, not the temperature. I have stayed with D50 for reasons already stated (it is at least closer to typical viewing temperatures) but I have adjusted the monitor luminance to match typical viewing luminance. Standard (ISO) luminance for viewing graphics is considered to be 350-500 lux (critical viewing is generally accepted as 8.5 lux). So I view prints initially at D50 and about 400-450 lux (but I then walk them around the house too). I have matched the monitor appearance to the print thus viewed. In calibrating the monitor, this comes out to a setting of about 50 cd/m2. This figure is lower than generally recommended monitor luminance, but I am viewing the monitor in a dimly lit room. I believe that many monitors will not allow such low figures, but the LaCie 321 I'm using will go down to about 40. Higher luminance settings on the monitor (even 80 or 90 cd/m2) represent the image as brighter, contrastier and crisper than the final print. This setup has been working quite well for me using Roy's ICC profiling approach. The screen is very highly predictive of the print and the relationship between screen and print is almost perfectly consistent. Walt --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Ernst Dinkla <E.Dinkla@...> wrote: > > I'm afraid it isn't a good idea to switch the total standard > (booth and monitor) to D65 to overcome limitations in monitors > or for any other reason. If metamerism was totally absent in > papers and inks it might be a solution. As long as many > galleries and living rooms have lighting that's on a lower > than 5000K number and the level of lighting isn't very high > either (Kruithof) it may be a better idea to stay with D50 (+ > more light) which is usually already cooler than the space > where the prints will be hanging. The level of illumination > (monitor + booth) is most likely the issue that has to be > controlled and that will be a problem on many flatscreens now > in use. > > Ernst > -- > > -- > Ernst Dinkla > > > www.pigment-print.com > ( unvollendet ) >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] D50 or D65 calibration prints & screen calibration?
2006-08-31 by wwodets
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.