Larry, I am not sure what the point is? BTW, the new Canon digital to be released in Orlando next month is said to be a 6 megapixel camera with a 1:1 chip. So the focal length of a 50mm lens is the same whether it is digital or 35mm film. Mike --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "riskdr8138" <L.PIRRONE@A...> wrote: > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Pics4U@e... wrote: > > Whenever I shoot something that requires that kind of DOF, I'm > > normally shooting wide angle and the DOF just takes care of itself. > > Besides, I'm a believer is staying away from the first two and last > two > > stops of any lens. IMHO? The extra sharpness of a middle upper > > f/stop such as f/8 or f/11 seems to give the results I need. > > > > I'm also primarily a people shooter so such things as 6 second > > shutter speeds aren't possible in many situations. > > > > Greg > > > > > How do you get adequate DOF in a 35mm digital camera at f/8 w/o > the > > > use of movements? As a LF shooter, I get into the near/far > > > relationships of DOF and find that f/8 does not come close to > giving > > > me what I need. > > the lenses in a digital camera are of a much shorter focal length > than in a 35 mm camera for the same angle of view. f8 in these lenses > has much greater depth of field than in a 35mm camera. the same > principal holds true for the 4x5. a 150mm lense has the same angle of > view (approximately) as a 50 mm lense in a 35mm cam. hense the need > for some movements on the 4x5. larry pirrone > > > > Movement? If the wind is blowing, I am at home sleeping. > > > > > > Mike
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by mkravit
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.