So--what you are saying is that I AM better off buying the newer 2400 than sticking with the 2200/RIPs, et.al. Diane > what I'm wondering about is---if one is going to 3rd party inks or > 3rd party software---are we not as well off to stick with what we have? > I'm > not seeing the need of buying a new printer if I'm back to dealing with > RIPs, 3rd party inksets, etc.--as I am now with the 2200. > Yes, gallery quality black and white printing is beginning to filter out into two categories: Those willing to pay for an R2400 or above (above including the Canon iPF5000), and get both color and b&w from the same printer, with the same inks, and the OEM driver; and those who want cheaper b&w from an older model. Third party inks, specialty RIPs etc, are only needed for the second category. C. David Tobie
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: HP Photosmart Pro B9180 metamerism
2006-09-14 by Diane Fields
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.