Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] New large format approach -- 4K+

2006-10-03 by Paul Roark

Yes, for me it was just a cost and familiarity issue.  I assume many of the
rips can do the same thing.

 

Paul

www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.paulroark.com/>  

 

 

  _____  

From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Greg
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 7:58 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] New large format approach -- 4K+

 

--- In DigitalBlackandWhit
<mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>
eThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Michael King"
<drmrking@...> wrote:
>
> Paul,
> 
> I am trying to understand more about the choice of rips and in your
post you
> said;
> 
> "This approach will only work with a rip, with QTR and IJC being the
logical
> ones for most B&W printers"
> 
> Would StudioPrint not be another logical choice or is there a
problem with
> Studioprint?
> Which rip would you use if you were not too concerned about cost?
> 
> Txs,
> 
> Mike

Studio Print should work fine for anyone that already owns it. The
cost is the factor that leaves it out for most people.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.