In a message dated 10/3/06 10:57:31 PM, dlruckus@... writes: > My thought is that the out take was > CD's way of segueing into a pitch for the latest and greatest. Clever > promotion. > Fair enough, and I'm certainly a sucker for the latest and greatest. But I sincerely believe that much of the impact of that image would not have been there if I had shot it with an earlier generation of digital camera, rather than a Canon full format sensor, and an L series lens, and had processed it with an earlier form of software, rather than a current RAW convertor, on an earlier generation of monitor, with older calibration, rather than a Cinema Display and Spyder2PRO, and most directly to the point, if I had printed it on an earlier generation inkjet, rather than a Z3100 through a PrintFIX PRO 2.0 profile. > > Nothing wrong with the latest and greatest from my perspective---but, > I suspect that most of those walking the halls of great museums know > easily what they like and are impressed by, and few beyond scholars > and artists disect the techniques and tools used. > > If you would like to move back to analog, I agree that a good 8x10 shot, > printed at the same size, could easily have stopped the crowd walking by, but > that would have been quite a feat to shoot on a floating dock, and to print at > 3x5 foot size; and I certainly couldn't have done it in an hour, on the show > floor. > > CD's target audience was and is already predisposed toward the new, > but the print he mentioned must have been impressive enough on it's > own to make people want it. I doubt greatly that a nothing ho..hum > content would have drawn much aclaim, irrespective of technical print > quality. > Otherwise all would have been saying "man.I want that machine" rather > than "I want that print". > Absolutely agreed that a good image is still central, whatever the medium (otherwise, whats it all for?) And the image I mentioned certainly won my own informal popularity test, in that it was the "most stolen" image at the ColorVision booth. I had a hard time printing copies of it fast enough to have one left in the light box when I needed it. All over Europe there are now images of Southwest Harbor Maine, which people there are assuming are Scotland, or Scandinavia... > CD is a great contributer of his knowledge to this and other groups > but his recompense is to gain a platform. > Its more complex than that. I contribute, but I also I learn from the groups, and I find out from them what people are interested in, what they need, what they want. Then I try to find ways to meet those needs in the products I develop. And when, after months of not talking about products under development, I finally get to tell people about them, I'm sure I am overly enthusiastic about it. Soon enough it will be testers that are posting about PrintFIX PRO 2.0 instead of me, and I can settle into a more comfortable position of answering their questions, not whipping up my own posts from scratch. C. David Tobie Product Technology Manager ColorVision Business Unit Datacolor Inc. CDTobie@... www.colorvision.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: What Makes a Good Digital B&W Print???
2006-10-04 by CDTobie@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.