Terry, >Just trying to sort out the differences between these two ink sets. . . . >Am I correct in saying that the primary difference between UT-3D and UT7 is >the tonality (i.e. "colour") of the cool toners and having a Lab a* >(selenium) toner instead of a Sepia toner in the Y position? Yes. >Would it work to put the Lab a* toner into the Y position in a UT7 set, > and then use QTR to create a selenium curve? You could, but the UT7 cool toner already has enough magenta (actually R800 Blue) in it. In fact, being able to deal with what is sometimes an excess of magenta is one of the points of the 3D inkset. Between paper and inkset batch differences, this can become a problem. > Is it difficult to create split tones using QTR and either inkset? ... I'm not a QTR expert. But, I think it depends of whether you want to split the tones between highlights and shadows, or between 2 different areas in the print. It's easy to have highlights be cooler or warmer. I think you'll have trouble getting QTR to split tones by area, however. That is one advantage of the Epson driver -- RGB curves approach. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] UT-3D vs UT7
2006-10-07 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.