The UT-3D inkset does not need the LK either. So, you could save that spot for whatever you'd like. The 3D-M is the main ink for black generation. Use mostly it and some of the C (dark carbon) to get the tone where you want it. You're on your own for the curves, however. I set the C and M channels first and then move the lighter Y (a axis) ink to where I want it. Hope it works for you. Paul www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.paulroark.com/> _____ From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Terry Ritz Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 12:53 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Digital BW] UT-3D vs UT7 > Paul Roark wrote: > > >I notice the QTR curves for UT-7 do not use LK, either the > > warm or cool ones. Do you know why? > > I can't answer for Roy, but LK is not needed for the UT7 > approach. So, I > assume it was reserved for other inks or Glop. Could I anticipate that the same would be true for UT-3D? In other words, could I take a UT7 curve, continue leaving out LK, make the appropriate tonal adjustments and the re-linearize? For reference, the UT7 Enh Matte warm curve uses K, C and LC and the cool curve uses K, M and LM. Conversly, would QTR curves for both UT7 and UT-3D potentially benefit from including LK? I guess I'm unclear as to where the density of LK sits, relative to C and LC. Which inks are combined to handle K on glossy media, and how? I understand that PK is not required. I think I'm out of, or almost out of questions. ;-) Thank you, Terry. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] UT-3D vs UT7
2006-10-07 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.